Once a titan in the tech world, with a valuation soaring above 50 billion CNY, Royole Corporation has succumbed to the trials of the market. This former darling of the tech industry was spectacularly declared bankrupt last week due to its inability to cover its debts. Just a few years ago, it was celebrated as a pioneer of foldable screens, impressing audiences on national television and drawing in rounds of investment from eager capital markets.

The narrative of Royole’s fall is not merely a story of sudden misfortune. It echoes a pattern of prior crises and worker dissatisfaction that society had begun to notice even before the bankruptcy announcement. From late 2021 through to April 2022, Royole frequently topped search rankings as news broke about unpaid wages. These financial strains continued to mount, and by the end of 2023, reports emerged that employees and suppliers alike were rallying together for payments they had long been owed. Rumors of impending bankruptcy flooded the airwaves as early as the beginning of this year, highlighting a brewing storm that was hard to ignore.

But how did a company that once had such high hopes and potential become a ghost of its former self? This tale begins not just with the technology but with the man who had ambitious dreams but may have aimed too high.

Founded in 2012, Royole was born into a rapidly rising market for high-end smartphones. Market leaders like BOE Technology Group were finally emerging from years of losses. The brains behind Royole, Liu Zihong, who partnered with esteemed alumni from Tsinghua University and Stanford, saw an opportunity to capitalize on this burgeoning space and established the company in both Silicon Valley and Shenzhen.

Advertisement

From the outset, Royole focused on flexible displays and sensors. At the end of its founding year, Zihong showcased a flexible electronic ink display at a local entrepreneurship competition, astonishing over thirty investors. Local venture capitals swiftly invested before the product had even been officially launched. This early success helped Royole build a robust funding base, attracting considerable attention in the following years.

Liu Zihong's accolades are impressive. He achieved remarkable academic success early in life, gaining admission to Tsinghua University at 17 before earning a doctorate from Stanford as one of its fastest graduates. His experience at IBM solidified his reputation as a genius among his peers, with many believing he could rival tech tycoon Robin Li of Baidu.

This early credibility set the stage for rapid advancements. By 2014, Royole had developed the world’s thinnest flexible display, just 0.01 mm thick, instantly marking its entry into the elite ranks of tech innovators. By 2017, they were unveiling prototypes like the FlexPhone, touted as a cutting-edge, rollable smartphone.

The pinnacle of Royole’s hype came on October 31, 2018, just before Samsung showcased its foldable phones. Royole seized the opportunity, presenting the FlexPai, a foldable phone that earned the title of the world’s first in its class. Such breakthroughs propelled the company’s profile rapidly, as investors rushed in. Between 2012 and 2021, Royole amassed nearly 10 billion in capital funding through nine financing rounds, peaking at an astounding valuation of 52.2 billion CNY.

However, the spoils of success came with a price, a lesson often forgotten in the tech world. Zihong's relentless ambition led him to make grand proclamations of Royole leading the industry, forecasting a decline for competitors like BOE and Huaxing Optoelectronics. Yet, not long after, the tables turned significantly, as Royole faced its own hardships, rendering its founder a cautionary tale.

Critics attribute Royole’s decline largely to Zihong’s insufficient management capabilities. Despite being a brilliant engineer, the complexities of running a company proved challenging for him. Holding a commanding majority share in the company gave Zihong immense power, but it also led to significant managerial shortcomings, as few decisions were made without his consent.

Feedback from former employees indicates Zihong relied too heavily on his scientific background and ideals rather than forming partnerships or collaborations that could have positioned Royole better in the market. Reports suggest that many firms sought collaboration but were turned away, leading to missed opportunities. A notable incident involved Foxconn’s founder, Terry Gou, attempting to invest in Royole, only for negotiations to break down over price disagreements.

Furthermore, Zihong’s vision of emulating a behemoth like Samsung led him down a costly path—establishing a fully autonomous production line that required massive investments. Even with extraordinary funds poured into the development and production capabilities, the market did not embrace Royole’s full flexible displays. Major phone manufacturers hesitated to approach, leaving Royole overextended and overwhelmed.

The inflexible push for in-house production, amid stagnating sales, drained the company financially. Instead of re-evaluating strategy during challenging times, the management chose to double down, further pouring funds into production expansions that drove the company to the brink of bankruptcy. As cash flow dried up, Royole struggled to meet payroll, placing it in the headlines for all the wrong reasons.

As Royole continued its downward spiral, the validity of its much-touted proprietary technology came under scrutiny. While Royole claimed to offer a low-cost, high-efficiency alternative to existing products, industry critiques surfaced questioning the viability of their production outputs. Some insiders revealed that the company struggled with quality control and that their purported achievements were often exaggerated.

Meanwhile, competitors like BOE rapidly advanced, clearly learning from Royole's missteps, and reaping the profits of a booming market for flexible displays. Current statistics indicate that the foldable phone market is thriving, boasting growth upwards of 114.5% year-on-year. Unlike Royole, which aimed for independent innovation, others capitalized on strategic partnerships and a more pragmatic approach to meet consumer needs.

In retrospect, Royole’s decline serves as a somber reminder of the unpredictability of the tech industry, where sustainability is often far more important than creativity. Despite its surging ambitions and early milestones, this tale conveys that passion must marry strategy for success; otherwise, as Royole illustrates, the ambitious may end up chasing dreams that slip further out of reach.